Thailand Monarchy

In an era of declining popularity of royalty in many countries, there's no doubt that Thailand's King Bhumibol Adulyadej  - the longest reigning monarch in the world - and his wife Queen Sirikit stand out as extrodinary exceptions. Held in overwhelming affection by the vast majority of Thai citizens, they are viewed as symbols of national identity every bit as much as the flag or national anthem and pictures of the King and Queen adorn almost home and office building. Their birthdays, also celebrated as Fathers Day and Mothers Day, are national holidays and are marked with large celebrations. At these times, huge portraits and photos of them spring up all over Thailand in front of large buildings and at traffic intersections, and newspapers and websites are full of messages of congratulations. Although nominally a ceremonial position, the respect given to the King means he has enormous power should he choose to wield it and no politican could dare to contradict the words of the King.

Venerated partly through tradition and the law (see below), but mainly for the way they are perceived to have dedicated themselves to improving the lives of the Thai people, it can be hard for foreigners to comprehend the relationship between the monarchy and the common people. They've travelled extensively to the remotest and most deprived parts of Thailand to find out and listen to the concerns of the rural poor and then endeavour to provide practical solutions. Despite having royal photographers, the King often takes photos himself to document what he finds and is frequently seen in royal photos with a camera around his neck. The results are impressive - the King personally holds patents on a artifical rain making techniques for instance, and there's a long list ist of royal initated projects to improve agriculture and faming conditions, education and health. The King is in his eighties however, and so in recent years these activities have had to be scaled down somewhat.

All this goes to show that expressing negative opinions of the monarchy will go down very badly in Thailand, and if you have any you are well advised to keep them to yourself. Indeed, it's well worth being aware of the fact that the crime of lese-majeste - "the crime of violating majesty, an offense against the dignity of a reigning sovereign" - carries a minimum sentence of 3 years imprisonment and a maximum of 15 years, and Thailand is one of few countries where offences against this law are still prosecuted. While few visitors would likely go out of their way to cause offence, the implications of this and the Thai reverence towards the monarchy are more subtle than it may initally seem. For instance, if you drop a coin or banknote (which have the King's image on them) on the floor you shouldn't trap them with your feet - an action viewed as stamping on the King's head. Similarly, you can't, for example, roll up a newspaper with a picture of the King on the front to use to squish a mosquito. Any such actions will undoubtedly cause offence to Thais who witness them, and you will likely be reminded (hopefully politely!) of the inappropriateness of such actions. Rumours abound of tourists who, after getting in a heated argument with a street vendor over something or other, tear up a bank note in anger and storm off, only to be assaulted moments later by enraged locals who witness the incident. In general there's no need to worry unduly about causing offence under this law, as any genuine mistakes are quickly forgiven and forgotten if you apologise.

It's not just unsuspecting tourists who can caught out by this law either. The Hollywood movie 'Anna and the King' had to be shot in Malaysia and is still banned in Thailand for it's unsympathetic (and by all accounts, inaccurate) portrayal of Thailand's King Mongkut and for what was judged as inappropriate advertising. In 2002 journalists from the respected Far Eastern Economic Review, one of whom had lived in Thailand for 20 years, had their visas revoked for 'threating national security' for publishing an article referring to relations between the King and then-prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, and an issue of The Economist the same year was banned in Thailand for questioning whether the widespread reverence to the monarchy was beneficial to Thailand.
If you've got any comments on this page, or can add to or correct it, then we'd love to hear from you.
Your name:

Comments may be edited for content or clarity.

The heading of the article includes "Royal Family". There is no info on the children.
' clai
All © Into Asia 2000-2014. All rights reserved. By using this site you agree to accept our terms of use.
Comments or suggestions welcome -

Colombia Travel Guide
Ton Sai Beach
Ko Phi Phi, Thailand
Wat Yai Chaimongkol
Ayuthaya, Thailand